National Popular Vote, Electoral college reform (title)
"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors ..." -- U.S. Constitution
Endorsed by 1,181
State Legislators
In addition to 439 state legislative sponsors (shown above), 742 other legislators have cast recorded votes in favor of the National Popular Vote bill.
Editorial Support
"It's time to make the change with this innovative plan"
— Chicago Sun Times editorial
Short Explanation
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee a majority of the Electoral College to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote in the Electoral College reflects the choice of the nation's voters for President of the United States.   more
Video Explanation
Organizations
Upcoming Events
Read the Book
Advisory Board
John Anderson (R-I–IL)
Birch Bayh (D–IN)
John Buchanan (R–AL)
Tom Campbell (R–CA)
Tom Downey (D–NY)
D. Durenberger (R–MN)
Jake Garn (R–UT)
21 Houses Pass Bill
70% Public Support
What Do You Think
How should we elect the President?
The candidate who gets the most votes in all 50 states.
The current Electoral College system.

Add this poll to your web site
Jewish Alliance


Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action

Legislative Alerts

8 Iyyar 5768     May 13, 2008

Action Needed:

Interstate Compact on National Popular Vote for President


In Memorium

The Rev. Dr. Krister Stendahl

an important voice for justice, interfaith dialogue and peace

Popular National Vote for Presidency

Legislation that would allow Massachusetts to enter an Interstate compact on national popular vote is pending. Under this legislation, states would agree that their electoral votes would be cast for the winner of the national popular vote. The impact of this legislation would increase the need for candidates to campaign in all states, since the vote of all states would matter (unlike the present system where only a few states are actually in play. It would also lessen the disproportional weight of the smaller states in the current system. For many years, civil rights groups have been concerned about changes in the electoral college. It had been thought that large cities in the North with large minority populations were important in determining the outcome of significant states. There was also the fear that a Constitutional Convention could open up the opportunities for reckless changes in the Bill of Rights. However, minority groups are less likely today to see advantages of the electoral system since population patterns are different today. And the Interstate Compact proposal does not depend on a national constitutional convention.

Action Requested:

JALSA urges calls to the legislature to support H678 and calls to friends in other states where this proposal is pending. For further information, call Common Cause 617-426-9600. ccma@commoncause.org

Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action | 18 Tremont Street | Suite 320 | Boston | MA | 02108

Reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote reflects the nationwide popular vote for President