"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors ..." -- U.S. Constitution
Ask your legislators to pass National Popular Vote

ZIP:
Endorsed by 2,110
State Legislators
In addition to 1,129 state legislative sponsors (shown above), 981 other legislators have cast recorded votes in favor of the National Popular Vote bill.
Progress by State

Tom Golisano

Entrepreneur Tom Golisano Endorses National Popular Vote

Short Explanation
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee a majority of the Electoral College to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote in the Electoral College reflects the choice of the nation's voters for President of the United States.   more
11 Enactments
The National Popular Vote bill has been enacted into law in states possessing 165 electoral votes — 61% of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate the legislation.

  • Maryland - 10 votes
  • Massachusetts - 11
  • Washington - 12 votes
  • Vermont - 3 votes
  • Rhode Island - 4 votes
  • DC - 3 votes
  • Hawaii - 4 votes
  • New Jersey - 14 votes
  • Illinois - 20 votes
  • New York - 29 votes
  • California - 55 votes

  • Videos

    Fox Interview

    CBS Video

    Popular Vote

    Class Election

    more videos

    Advisory Board
    John Anderson (R-I–IL)
    Birch Bayh (D–IN)
    John Buchanan (R–AL)
    Tom Campbell (R–CA)
    Tom Downey (D–NY)
    D. Durenberger (R–MN)
    Jake Garn (R–UT)
    What Do You Think
    How should we elect the President?
    The candidate who gets the most votes in all 50 states.
    The current Electoral College system.

    Add this poll to your web site
    The Columbian
    In our view, April 17: Equal Voting
    Legislature sends Electoral College reform measure to governor for signature
    The Columbian editorial
    April 17, 2009

    Washington will become the fifth state to join an interstate compact that would essentially bypass the Electoral College and assure the leading national vote-getter of winning presidential elections. The state House on Wednesday night approved the measure by a 52-42 vote. The Senate had approved the bill earlier, and Gov. Chris Gregoire is expected to sign it soon.

    The national popular vote bill was approved in both chambers largely by Democrats. Clark County Democratic legislators supported the reform while local Republican lawmakers opposed it.

    This effort in our state will add momentum to the national movement to bypass the Electoral College, which four times in our nation's history (most recently in 2000, when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore) has allowed a candidate who did not win the national popular vote to become president.

    As we have editorialized often, this is undemocratic and un-American. Only one public election in the nation allows the possibility of the leading vote-getter to losing, and it's not some local race for dogcatcher. It's the most vital decision Americans make, to select the most powerful person in the world.

    Abolishing the Electoral College would require a constitutional amendment; it's supported by Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution. But in this case a more direct reform is needed, and here's how the interstate compact would work: It would only take effect when adopted by enough states to form 270 electoral votes (the minimum to win the presidency), at which time all electors from those states would agree to vote for the national popular winner.

    Voters (the ones who matter most) make their voices heard in November, and electors vote in December. Last year, Jane Buchanan-Banks of Felida was one of Washington's 11 electors, all of whom voted for Barack Obama.

    He, of course, was the national winner, but what those 11 electors did at that Dec. 15 meeting in Olympia should make all Republicans absolutely livid. On that day, the 1.2 million Washingtonians who voted for John McCain instantly became meaningless. It was as if they had never voted.

    Ironically, it is Republican lawmakers in Olympia who opposed efforts to repair this abominable system, generally because they believe the Founding

    Fathers knew best how to elect a president. Also ironically, it is Republicans who often scream loudest about counting every vote and making sure every vote counts equally, yet the Electoral College threatens those noble concepts. And here's a scenario that should especially outrage Republicans:

    Had George W. Bush not won Ohio in 2004 (it was a close race there), he would have lost to John Kerry despite receiving 3 million more votes … because of the Electoral College.

    Washingtonians largely support this common-sense reform. Four months ago, a statewide poll of 800 voters by the national firm Public Policy Polling showed that 77 percent wanted the leading vote-getter to win the presidency; among Democrats, there was 85 percent support, and among Republicans it was 68 percent.

    When Washington becomes the fifth state to join the compact, it will give the movement 23 percent of the needed electoral votes. Similar efforts are under way in several other states. For the sake of every vote counting equally in America's most vital election, we hope those efforts move forward.


    Reform the Electoral College so that the electoral vote reflects the nationwide popular vote for President